Summary
Editor's rating
Is the renewed 50mm f/1.2L actually worth the money?
Chunky, solid, and not exactly discreet
Generic box, but the essentials are there
Build quality and how the refurbished unit holds up
Image quality and autofocus: strong but with quirks at f/1.2
What you actually get with this renewed 50mm f/1.2L
Pros
- Very shallow depth of field and smooth background blur at f/1.2
- Solid L-series build quality with weather resistance and metal mount
- Renewed unit arrived in near-new condition with hood and pouch included
Cons
- Still expensive even as refurbished, especially versus the 50mm f/1.4
- Softness and focus inconsistency at f/1.2 if you’re not careful
- Bulky and heavy for a 50mm, less discreet for casual or street shooting
Specifications
View full product page →| Brand | Canon |
A pricey classic… but bought refurbished
I picked up this Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM (Renewed) because I wanted that shallow depth of field look everyone talks about, but I didn’t feel like paying full new-price for a lens that came out years ago. I’ve used the 50mm f/1.8 and the 50mm f/1.4 before on my Canon bodies (5D Mark III and an old 6D), so I had a pretty clear idea of what I was getting into and what I wanted to compare it with. The twist here is that this one is refurbished, so condition and reliability were my main concerns.
Out of the box, the lens honestly looked almost new. No scratches on the glass, no obvious marks on the barrel, mount was clean, and the focus ring felt smooth. It came in a generic box, not the usual Canon red-and-white, but that was expected for a renewed product. I got a hood and a pouch in the package, which was a nice bonus considering some renewed deals arrive pretty barebones.
I’ve been using it for a few weeks now for portraits, some indoor family shots, and a couple of low-light events. I shot mostly between f/1.2 and f/2, because let’s be real, if you buy this lens to shoot at f/5.6 all day, you’re basically paying for a badge. My main focus was: is the extra cost over the 50mm f/1.4 actually visible in real use, or is it just a flex and a red ring?
Short version: the background blur and low-light ability are great, but the lens is not magic. The focus can be a bit hit-or-miss wide open, it’s heavy for a 50mm, and the renewed price still isn’t cheap. It’s a solid tool if you know what you’re doing and accept its quirks, but if you’re expecting perfect sharpness and zero focusing issues at f/1.2, you might be a bit surprised.
Is the renewed 50mm f/1.2L actually worth the money?
Let’s talk price, because that’s the big question with this lens. Even as a renewed unit, the 50mm f/1.2L is not cheap. You’re still spending a serious chunk of money compared to the 50mm f/1.8 or even the 50mm f/1.4. In practice, what you’re paying for is: f/1.2 aperture, nicer background blur, better build, and weather resistance. The question is whether those things matter enough for how you shoot. For casual users who mostly take photos of friends and family in good light, I’d say the cheaper 50s already do a solid job.
Compared to buying this lens brand new, the renewed option does make more sense. You get close to the same performance and condition, but you save a noticeable amount. My copy looked almost like new, and the image quality is the same as any other 50mm f/1.2L. The trade-off is a shorter warranty and the small risk that the refurb process wasn’t perfect. If you’re comfortable checking the lens thoroughly in the return window, the price/performance ratio is pretty solid for someone who really wants f/1.2 without paying full retail.
Where the value becomes questionable is if you’re on the fence between this and the 50mm f/1.4. The 1.4 is smaller, lighter, a lot cheaper, and already good enough for most portrait and low-light work. The difference between f/1.4 and f/1.2 is visible, but not huge. You don’t suddenly unlock a whole new world; you just get a bit more blur and a bit more light. For some people (wedding shooters, portrait fans, people who love that look), that’s worth paying for. For others, it’s probably just expensive overkill.
So in terms of value for money, I’d say: this renewed 50mm f/1.2L makes sense if you know exactly why you want it and you’re already bumping into the limits of your 50mm f/1.4 or f/1.8. If you’re just curious or you shoot mostly stopped down, your money might be better spent on another lens or lighting gear. It’s a good lens, but the price still stings, even refurbished.
Chunky, solid, and not exactly discreet
Physically, this lens is pretty chunky for a 50mm. It weighs around 1.26 pounds (about 570g), and you feel that right away when you mount it on the camera. On my 5D Mark III it balances okay, but on the smaller 80D it felt a bit front-heavy. If you’re used to the featherweight 50mm f/1.8, this will feel like putting a small brick on the front of your camera. Not unmanageable, but definitely noticeable if you shoot all day.
The barrel is classic Canon L-series: mostly matte black finish, red ring, and a distance scale under glass. The focus ring is wide and rubberized, with a smooth but slightly damped feel. It’s easy to grab and use, even with gloves. The AF/MF switch is the usual tiny Canon slider, nothing special. No extra buttons, no IS switch because there is no image stabilization. It’s a clean and simple layout, but the size makes the camera feel more serious and a bit more intimidating for casual subjects.
One thing I noticed is that the lens hood is quite big, so once you put that on, the whole setup looks even bulkier. It does help with flare and it protects the front element, so I kept it on most of the time, but if you want a compact walk-around setup, this is not it. Compared to the 50mm f/1.4, the 1.2L is noticeably larger in diameter and length. You lose that discreet, small prime feel and move into “pro lens” territory, at least in appearance.
Overall, the design is practical but not subtle. It feels durable and serious, but if you like to shoot street or candid portraits without drawing attention, this is more obvious than the smaller 50s. I didn’t baby it, tossed it in my bag with other lenses, and the finish held up fine. Just don’t expect light and compact; this is more like carrying a small 85mm than a cheap plastic nifty-fifty.
Generic box, but the essentials are there
The packaging on this renewed version is very no-nonsense. It arrived in a plain cardboard box with foam inserts holding the lens in place. No glossy Canon branding, no printed manual, nothing fancy. If you’re used to unboxing brand-new gear with all the marketing fluff, this feels pretty bare, but honestly, it’s fine as long as the lens is protected, which it was. The box had enough padding that I wasn’t worried about shipping damage.
Inside, I got the lens with front and rear caps, a lens hood, and a soft pouch. The pouch isn’t luxury-grade, but it does the job of keeping scratches off the barrel when the lens is in a bag with other gear. The hood clips on firmly and doesn’t feel loose. For a refurbished product, I actually expected less, so having both hood and pouch included was a nice surprise. A lot of used lenses on the market show up without hoods, so this saved me an extra purchase.
There were also a couple of basic documents: a generic refurbished info sheet and warranty details. Nothing in-depth, but enough to know how long I’m covered and who to contact if something goes wrong. No fancy printed manual, but if you need that, it’s easy to find the PDF online. So in practice, you’re not missing anything critical by skipping the original retail box, unless you’re the type who likes to keep boxes for resale value later.
Overall, the packaging is purely functional. It protects the lens, gives you the main accessories, and that’s it. For a renewed product, that’s exactly what I expected. If you care more about how the gear works than how it’s presented, this setup is perfectly acceptable. If you like the whole “brand new unboxing” experience, then renewed probably isn’t for you anyway.
Build quality and how the refurbished unit holds up
From a build point of view, this feels like a typical Canon L-series brick. The barrel is solid, nothing rattles, and the mount is metal. After a few weeks of use, taking it in and out of the bag, shooting in light drizzle and dusty streets, I didn’t notice any new play in the focus ring or any weird noises. The weather-resistant label is nice, but I still wouldn’t soak it in heavy rain without a cover. I did shoot in a light shower for about 20 minutes, and there were no issues afterward—no fog, no moisture inside, everything kept working normally.
Because this is a renewed unit, my main worry was hidden issues: decentered elements, focus problems, or internal dust. I inspected it under a strong light when it arrived. There was maybe a tiny speck of dust inside, which is normal for a used lens and hasn’t affected images at all. The focus ring feels uniform throughout the range, and AF hasn’t made any grinding or odd sounds. After a few hundred shots, nothing changed, so at least in the short term, the refurb job seems solid.
The finish on the barrel is holding up fine. I usually carry my lenses in a padded backpack, not in a hard case, and this one already went through a couple of short trips. No peeling, no loose rubber, and the markings are still clear. The lens hood feels sturdy too; I bumped it a couple of times against door frames and tables, and it did its job protecting the front without cracking. So from a day-to-day use perspective, it handles normal abuse without fuss.
Long-term, these lenses are known to last if you don’t drop them or soak them. Since this is already used/refurbished, I’d say check your copy thoroughly in the first days: front and back focus, AF consistency, and any odd noises. If it passes that early test, chances are it’ll be fine. I can’t say it’s bulletproof, but for now, mine feels trustworthy enough to take on paid shoots without stressing about it every second.
Image quality and autofocus: strong but with quirks at f/1.2
Let’s get to the point: the bokeh and low-light performance are the main reasons to buy this lens. At f/1.2, backgrounds melt away very quickly, and you get that classic creamy blur behind your subject. For portraits, it looks great, especially with some distance between the subject and the background. Faces pop, lights in the background turn into nice round blobs, and indoor shots at ISO 100–800 are easy even in dim rooms. Compared to the 50mm f/1.4, the difference is not night-and-day, but you do see a bit more separation and a slightly softer roll-off.
Sharpness is where the lens is a bit more mixed. At f/1.2, it’s usable but not razor-sharp, especially around the edges. The center is decent, but you can see some softness and glow, particularly on high-contrast edges. If you stop down to f/1.8 or f/2, things improve clearly, and by f/2.8 it’s very good across most of the frame. For portraits, that wide-open softness can actually be flattering, so I didn’t mind it much, but if you’re expecting clinical sharpness wide open, that’s not what this lens is about.
Autofocus is relatively fast and quiet thanks to the ring-type USM, but at f/1.2 the depth of field is very thin, so any tiny focus error is obvious. On my 5D Mark III, I had a few missed shots where the focus grabbed the eyelashes instead of the eyes, or the ear instead of the face. After some microadjustment and using single-point AF carefully, the hit rate went up, but I still wouldn’t call it foolproof. For moving subjects in low light, you really need to pay attention and fire off a few extra frames to be safe.
In terms of other optical stuff: there is some vignetting at f/1.2 (dark corners), which mostly clears up by f/2. There’s also a bit of chromatic aberration (purple fringing) on high-contrast edges wide open, but most cameras and software correct this easily. Flare control is decent with the hood on. Overall, the performance is strong if you use it for what it’s good at: portraits, low light, and shallow depth of field. If you mostly shoot at f/4 and above, you’re not really gaining much over cheaper lenses.
What you actually get with this renewed 50mm f/1.2L
This is a Canon EF-mount prime lens, 50mm focal length, fixed, with a maximum aperture of f/1.2. No zoom, no image stabilization, just a big chunk of glass with a very bright aperture. The copy I got is the typical L-series build: red ring, distance window, AF/MF switch, and a pretty wide focus ring. It’s rated as weather-resistant, but keep in mind that full sealing also depends on your camera body and using a front filter.
Being a renewed/refurbished product, it came in a plain box. Inside, there was the lens, front and rear caps, a lens hood, and a soft pouch. No fancy Canon manuals or warranty card, just the standard refurbished paperwork and a limited warranty from the seller. The description said it was tested, cleaned, and repackaged, and judging by the condition, I’d say that’s accurate. No haze, no fungus, and only tiny cosmetic signs of use on the barrel if you look really closely.
On a full-frame body, 50mm is pretty much the classic “normal” focal length. I used it for portraits, street photos, and a few quick product shots. On a crop-sensor body (I briefly tried it on an old 80D), it behaves more like an 80mm equivalent, so more of a short telephoto, which is not a bad thing for portraits but less flexible indoors. The lens has a 72mm filter thread, so if you’re coming from the smaller 50mm f/1.8 or f/1.4, your old filters probably won’t fit.
In practice, this renewed version behaves like a regular 50mm f/1.2L. There’s nothing “discount” about the optical performance; it’s the same design. The only real difference is you’re trusting the refurb process and the shorter warranty instead of getting that brand-new, straight-from-factory assurance. If you’re okay with that trade-off and you inspect your copy as soon as it arrives, it’s a fairly straightforward deal.
Pros
- Very shallow depth of field and smooth background blur at f/1.2
- Solid L-series build quality with weather resistance and metal mount
- Renewed unit arrived in near-new condition with hood and pouch included
Cons
- Still expensive even as refurbished, especially versus the 50mm f/1.4
- Softness and focus inconsistency at f/1.2 if you’re not careful
- Bulky and heavy for a 50mm, less discreet for casual or street shooting
Conclusion
Editor's rating
After using the Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM (Renewed) for a few weeks, my take is pretty straightforward: it delivers the shallow depth of field and low-light performance it’s known for, but it’s not magic and it’s not cheap. The refurbished unit I got was in near-new condition, both cosmetically and functionally, so on that front I’m satisfied. Autofocus is quick enough and quiet, build quality feels solid, and the lens handled light rain and everyday bumps without any issues.
Image-wise, you get strong subject separation, very pleasing blur, and decent sharpness in the center, especially once you stop down a bit. At f/1.2, it’s usable but not razor-sharp, and you need to accept a thinner margin for error on focus. If you’re expecting perfect hit rates and clinical sharpness wide open, this isn’t that kind of lens. It’s more of a “character and look” tool than a technical perfection monster.
Who is this for? People who really care about that f/1.2 look, shoot a lot of portraits or low-light scenes, and understand how to work around the focus quirks. Also, folks who are okay with buying refurbished to save money and don’t mind a generic box. Who should skip it? Casual shooters, anyone happy with their 50mm f/1.8 or f/1.4, and those who want maximum sharpness and reliability at wide apertures without fuss. In short: it’s a strong lens with a specific purpose, good as renewed if you inspect it carefully, but there are definitely cheaper options that will be enough for many people.